[Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Thu Jul 23 13:59:32 UTC 2020


On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 09:35 -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 22/07/2020 19.05, bkil wrote:
> > But also consider that it wouldn't make sense to tag a motorway as
> > foot=no + bicycle=dismount (+ moped=dismount + mofa=dismount +
> > auto_rickshaw=no + agricultural=no), because the combination of
> > tags would
> > create a completely new meaning, and that is not a preferred
> > tagging
> > practice in OSM.
> > 
> > I.e., bicycle=dismount means that you can proceed after you
> > dismount,
> > however if a certain combination of other tags are also present
> > (foot=no),
> > a data user would need to ignore this, making this more confusing
> > than
> > necessary (bicycle=no).
> 
> I'm trying (and failing) to imagine a road/path/whatever that you
> are 
> allowed to walk on *iff* you are pushing a bicycle (or moped or...).
> Do 
> you know of any examples?
> 

I cannot think of many roads where you can walk but not cycle, other
than pedestrianised streets in town centres but you can walk on lots of
footpaths where you can push a bicycle. Some are too long and totally
unsuitable.


A few of examples from my local big town
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/HW9qSNB-1JlkQAC3SH_gZQ
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23896048

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350458507

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318709194

Phil (trigpoint)




More information about the Tagging mailing list