[Tagging] addr:street for routes

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Fri Jul 31 19:14:18 UTC 2020


I agree.

Proof of this is that a section of road which was formerly US Highway 99,
but where the highway ref is now on a new bypass, will often by signed as
“Old Highway 99”, so it’s reasonable to say that the name=* was “Highway
99” before.

-Joseph Eisenberg

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:01 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 31. Jul 2020, at 18:25, Jmapb <jmapb at gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> > But most of the ways in the route have no valid name. Segments were
> > imported from TIGER with name=State Highway 214 but that's been removed
> > in favor of ref=NY 214.
>
>
> around here we keep both, no need to remove the name if it makes sense.
> State Highway 214 looks like a reasonable name, especially outside of
> builtup areas.
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200731/cd291ecf/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list