[Tagging] [Talk-us] Heavily-wooded residential polygons

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Jun 2 21:22:26 UTC 2020




Jun 2, 2020, 20:16 by steveaOSM at softworkers.com:

> "this IS residential landuse."  (Not COULD BE, but IS).  Yes, this land might be "natural" now, including being "treed," but I could still build a patio and bbq there after perhaps cutting down some trees, it is my residential land and I am allowed to do that, meaning it has residential use, even if it is "unimproved" presently.  
>
It is a residential property, not a residential landuse.

> These facts do add to the difficulty:  OSM doesn't wish to appear to be removing property rights from residential landowners (by diminishing landuse=residential areas)
>
Are there people somehow believing that edits in OSM affect property rights and may remove them?
That is ridiculous.

>  but at the same time, significant portions of these areas do remain in a natural state, while distinctly and presently "having" residential landuse.  
>
For me and in my region (Poland) it would be treated as a clearly incorrect mapping.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200602/f0309798/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list