[Tagging] [OSM-talk] Should we map things that do not exist?
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Mon Jun 8 13:45:06 UTC 2020
Jun 8, 2020, 15:02 by pla16021 at gmail.com:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 13:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>> Jun 8, 2020, 14:28 by >> pla16021 at gmail.com>> :
>>> On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 12:41, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>>> tagging at openstreetmap.org>>> > wrote:
>> For example >> http://blog.imagico.de/verifiability-and-the-wikipediarization-of-openstreetmap/
>> promotes much stricter verification requirements.
>> I am not sure whatever I would want go so far, but mapping something
>> appearing in a single aerial imagery seem not ideal.
> So in parts of the world where only one source of aerial imagery is available,
> we can't map from it? That doesn't seem right.
I have slight trouble with things appearing in a single aerial imagery or single official dataset
and completely and utterly unverifiable otherwise.
I have no trouble at all with mapping for example river in region where only one
source of aerial imagery is available, as river remain verifiable by a ground survey.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging