[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - Qanat"

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Jun 20 23:43:05 UTC 2020



sent from a phone

> On 20. Jun 2020, at 09:33, Joseph Guillaume <josephguillaume at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That's right - what I meant is that we should not treat every qanat as historic just because it is old.


I do not follow. Can there be old underground water conveying structures that people have dug into the ground, that are not “historic”? Can you explain what kind of situation you are thinking about?

Cheers Martin 


More information about the Tagging mailing list