[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - Qanat"

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Jun 21 00:15:43 UTC 2020



sent from a phone

> On 21. Jun 2020, at 01:59, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Can there be old underground water conveying structures that people have dug into the ground, that are not “historic”? Can you explain what kind of situation you are thinking about?
> 
> The tag historic=* is not a synonym for old.  It is more nuanced than that.  See
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic


I am aware of the historic key and its meaning and my question stands.
How or in which cases can a structure like this not be suitable for the historic key?

Cheers Martin 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200621/48ed8535/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list