[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - Qanat"
pla16021 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 21 13:25:56 UTC 2020
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 08:11, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> you are raising the bar higher than it is. Every memorial is tagged as
> historic for example.
That is not a good argument. It is not (usually) the memorial itself which
historic interest but the event or person it commemorates.
For example, this plaque was unveiled in 1993:
The event it commemorates took place in 1176 and is considered to be
of great cultural and historical significance:
That plaque could be destroyed by a car driving into it and be replaced by
a new plaque. That new plaque would still qualify as historic=memorial
the moment it was installed, because the historical interest is in the event
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging