[Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - Qanat"

Joseph Guillaume josephguillaume at gmail.com
Mon Jun 22 07:30:49 UTC 2020


I suppose the reason I haven't provided an example is that historically
significant qanats are the exception in my opinion - in most cases I can't
think of a reason why it should be listed as historic other than being old.
So here's a random one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=554179257#map=17/33.44256/50.80580



On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 4:24 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 22. Jun 2020, at 00:07, Joseph Guillaume <josephguillaume at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > only some qanats are of historic value
>
>
> while I don’t think these must be absolutely tagged with historic=*, you
> still could show an example of a qanat that “isn’t of historic value” so
> that it becomes more convincing (or a description of one of these)
>
> Cheers Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200622/71f8671b/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list