[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3
jarek at piorkowski.ca
Mon Mar 9 13:21:45 UTC 2020
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 07:29, John Doe <music.kashish at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is quite off-topic, but I can't bear to read more completely unfounded criticism of PTv2.
highway=bus_stop ("PTv1") is fine for people who survey bus stops and
who want to approximately map a route of a simple bus.
PTv2 is fine for people who want to handle routes that have variants
and branches and who want computer validators to be able to spot
potential errors in these branches.
Some people on both sides don't want to see advantages of the other
scheme, and resort to flatly declaring them bad.
--Jarek (credentials: about 20 non-basic tram, bus, and train routes,
but in an area where stop locations are mostly already surveyed/known)
More information about the Tagging