[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3
jarek at piorkowski.ca
Mon Mar 9 22:26:33 UTC 2020
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 13:07, Dave F via Tagging
<tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 09/03/2020 13:21, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> > PTv2 is fine for people who want to handle routes that have variants
> > and branches and who want computer validators to be able to spot
> > potential errors in these branches.
> I'm intrigued: What Ptv2 tags enable those?
Separate relations per each route variant - verifying that the highway
ways are continuous in the relation.
Or are you suggesting to adopt the PTv2 one-relation-per-trip-variant
scheme without using public_transport=* tags? Feel free, as far as I
can tell JOSM PT plugin doesn't even complain about that. Just don't
be surprised if iD "upgrades" your tags after.
More information about the Tagging