[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v3

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 12:32:20 UTC 2020


> if we have to keep  highway=bus_stop anyway, then one could also say that it's not needed to add public_transport=platform to such nodes anymore.

Yes, that's right. It doesn't make sense to add 2 tags or 3 tags when 1 will do.

On 3/11/20, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> But if the originally, more common
>> tag highway=bus_stop is already used, there is no need to add bus=yes.
>>
>>
> OK, but if we have to keep  highway=bus_stop anyway, then one could also
> say that it's not needed to add public_transport=platform to such nodes
> anymore.
>
> And if we do that, then those nodes don't really need roles in the route
> relations either,
>
> The problem with PTv2 is that it was an attempt to streamline how buses
> were mapped based on how railway was mapped, where it would have made more
> sense to go in the other direction and map railway the way buses are
> mapped.
>
> Jo
>



More information about the Tagging mailing list