[Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes

[Hubert87]

I like the idea of using "buffered".

"doorzone" to me, is a pretty laoded and subjective.

Maybe something like:

cycleway:right=lane
cycleway:right:lane=exclusive
(cycleway:right:buffered=right/left/both/no)
cycleway:right:buffered:right=yes/no/0.3(m)

Yours
Hubert87

Am 03.05.2020 um 10:55 schrieb Jan Michel:
> Hi,
> I oppose adding this officially to the top-level cycleway:lane tag.
> I see this information as one more property of the cycleway, like
> surface, smoothness, width and so on.
>
> We already have a documented key 'cycleway:buffer' that is described
> as the width of the buffer space between car lanes and the bicycle lane.
> The 'cycleway:buffer' tag is also used combined with :left and :right
> to denote the buffer on left-hand and right-hand side of the cycleway.
>
> Mappers in Berlin worked on a more detailed tagging of buffer and
> protection of bicycle lanes, see (unfortunately in German only)
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Radwege
>
> I'd suggest to get in contact with them and discuss this. I imagine that
> this information could fit very well into the cycleway:buffer tag - A
> door zone is a non-existent buffer, so instead of 'no' one could use
> 'doorzone' as one of the non-numeric values.
>
> Jan
>
>
>
> On 03.05.20 08:37, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>> For a while myself and others have been using cycleway:lane=doorzone
>> to say the bicycle lane is in a doorzone, I've now added
>> documentation of this as "in use" at
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane. However this
>> conflicts with the other "in use" cycleway:lane=exclusive/advisory,
>> since you can have exclusive/advisory lanes which are doorzone or not.
>>
>> None of these have gone through a proposal process and both are
>> independently in use.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging