[Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes
Hubert87
sg.forum at gmx.de
Sun May 3 13:33:46 UTC 2020
Meant to also add a discriptive tag, like
cycleway:right:parking_lane=right/left/both/no/yes
Am 03.05.2020 um 15:12 schrieb Hubert87:
> I like the idea of using "buffered".
>
> "doorzone" to me, is a pretty laoded and subjective.
>
> Maybe something like:
>
> cycleway:right=lane
> cycleway:right:lane=exclusive
> (cycleway:right:buffered=right/left/both/no)
> cycleway:right:buffered:right=yes/no/0.3(m)
>
> Yours
> Hubert87
>
> Am 03.05.2020 um 10:55 schrieb Jan Michel:
>> Hi,
>> I oppose adding this officially to the top-level cycleway:lane tag.
>> I see this information as one more property of the cycleway, like
>> surface, smoothness, width and so on.
>>
>> We already have a documented key 'cycleway:buffer' that is described
>> as the width of the buffer space between car lanes and the bicycle lane.
>> The 'cycleway:buffer' tag is also used combined with :left and :right
>> to denote the buffer on left-hand and right-hand side of the cycleway.
>>
>> Mappers in Berlin worked on a more detailed tagging of buffer and
>> protection of bicycle lanes, see (unfortunately in German only)
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Radwege
>>
>> I'd suggest to get in contact with them and discuss this. I imagine that
>> this information could fit very well into the cycleway:buffer tag - A
>> door zone is a non-existent buffer, so instead of 'no' one could use
>> 'doorzone' as one of the non-numeric values.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03.05.20 08:37, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>>> For a while myself and others have been using cycleway:lane=doorzone
>>> to say the bicycle lane is in a doorzone, I've now added
>>> documentation of this as "in use" at
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane. However this
>>> conflicts with the other "in use" cycleway:lane=exclusive/advisory,
>>> since you can have exclusive/advisory lanes which are doorzone or not.
>>>
>>> None of these have gone through a proposal process and both are
>>> independently in use.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list