[Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes

[Andrew Harvey]

On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 22:08, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 6. May 2020, at 13:20, Lukas-458 at web.de wrote:
> >
> > I agree with that, but then note that for "justice" we would need a
> foot:doorzone=yes, too, because when a sidewalk is in the parking car's
> doorzone (I think most sidewalks next to parking:lane=parallel are), there
> is hazard for pedestrians, too. It might be not soo dangerus because
> pedestrians have much lower speed than cyclists often have, but if we want
> to tag that hazard I think we would have to affect both, foot and bicycle.
>
>
>
> indeed there is much fewer risk for pedestrians and I would not tag it.
> Next thing would be to add hazards for roof tiles that may fly from roofs
> in case of storm? Snow sliding from roofs in winter? There may be many
> hazards if you think it through...
> ;-)
>

I agree with Martin here, I don't think "foot:doorzone" is really needed as
the concept only applies to bicycles.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200506/55d6d75b/attachment-0001.htm>