[Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes

[Peter Elderson]

Seems to me that the hazard is a general hazard applying to all mixed
traffic/parking situations. I would not map such a general hazard. Mapping
events and risks, unless indicated by signage or markings, doesn't seem
like a good idea to me.

In specific cases the hazard may deserve mapping, then it should be tied to
specific OSM-objects, I think. If a parking "lane" is next to a cycle-lane,
then you might want to see that when rendering or weigh in/warn when
routing.

In that case I think maybe the best solution is to map the parking "lane"
next to the cycling lane. The hazard then follows from the proximity.

Best, Peter Elderson


Op wo 6 mei 2020 om 15:49 schreef <Lukas-458 at web.de>:

> Hmm okay, convinced. I only hope noone else comes with that topic later
> again then, but to me it's ok.
>
> -- Lukas
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 06. Mai 2020 um 14:15 Uhr
> *Von:* "Andrew Harvey" <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>
> *An:* "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes
>
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 22:08, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>> > On 6. May 2020, at 13:20, Lukas-458 at web.de wrote:
>> >
>> > I agree with that, but then note that for "justice" we would need a
>> foot:doorzone=yes, too, because when a sidewalk is in the parking car's
>> doorzone (I think most sidewalks next to parking:lane=parallel are), there
>> is hazard for pedestrians, too. It might be not soo dangerus because
>> pedestrians have much lower speed than cyclists often have, but if we want
>> to tag that hazard I think we would have to affect both, foot and bicycle.
>>
>>
>>
>> indeed there is much fewer risk for pedestrians and I would not tag it.
>> Next thing would be to add hazards for roof tiles that may fly from roofs
>> in case of storm? Snow sliding from roofs in winter? There may be many
>> hazards if you think it through...
>> ;-)
>
>
> I agree with Martin here, I don't think "foot:doorzone" is really needed
> as the concept only applies to bicycles.
> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200506/f122a411/attachment-0001.htm>