[Tagging] Remove non-prefixed versions of 'contact:' scheme

[Cj Malone]

On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 03:27 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> May 11, 2020, 02:36 by CjMalone at mail.com:
> > On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 23:07 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> > > > and gradually deprecating the generic tags.
> > >
> > > And there you go, wanting to get rid of phone=* and website=*.
> >
> > I think I stand by that quote, but I'm happy to discus it. I'm not
> > arguing that over night we should stop people using the phone tag.
>
> But "gradually deprecating" means that this tags will be eliminated,
> what seems to me to have the same meaning as "wanting to get rid of".
>
> Whatever it will done in 24 hours or 24 years is not changing that
> goal
> of tag deprecation is to utterly eliminate it.

I don't hate the phone tag because if it's name and want to fight
everyone so they have to type contact:phone because I want to utterly
eliminate phone. That's silly.

The goal is quantifiable and usable data.

If the end of this discussion is explicit tags for edge cases, and
phone only used for the contact phone number that's fine by me. Sure it
might look better with a contact: namespace and be easier to describe,
but that doesn't matter. It's the definitions that do.