[Tagging] Remove non-prefixed versions of 'contact:' scheme

Shawn K. Quinn skquinn at rushpost.com
Mon May 11 09:29:10 UTC 2020


On 5/10/20 7:36 PM, Cj Malone wrote:
> I think I stand by that quote, but I'm happy to discus it. I'm not
> arguing that over night we should stop people using the phone tag.
> Currently phone has at least 2 uses. A contact number and an incoming
> number for a phone box. We should split these out. If we are left with
> totally_new_tag_for_phoneboxes and phone, where
> totally_new_tag_for_phoneboxes is defined as incoming phone number and
> phone is defined as the contact number. I'm OK with that too, it's the
> definitions that really matter.

Why should we split these out?

In fact, I'm not sure how useful it is for us to tag phone numbers on
phoneboxes at all. Does anyone actually use this data for something useful?

-- 
Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
http://www.rantroulette.com
http://www.skqrecordquest.com



More information about the Tagging mailing list