[Tagging] relations & paths

[brad]

We had a pretty lengthy discussion last October subject:'Cycling 
relation misuse' .  I got the impression that a route should be more 
than just a short trail.

Are you saying that every trail should be route?
Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6632400

My subject line should have been route relations.

On 5/11/20 10:23 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Waymarked Trails associates waymarks only with routes, and assumes
> that any waymarked route, from local to international, will have a
> route relation describing it.
>
> Is there a reason that you see route relations for shorter routes as
> being 'wrong'?
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:17 PM brad <bradhaack at fastmail.com> wrote:
>> I see a lot of relations, type:route, which are only short
>> trails/paths.   This is wrong isn't it?   Do you suppose that folks are
>> doing this to get better rendering?
>> Brad
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>