[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Dog hazard

[Tod Fitch]

dog=yes|no|leashed already exists for a totally different semantic (letting dog owners know if their pet is allowed).

If this goes forward I would prefer reversing thing and make it hazard=dog. That would also allow other types of hazards to be mapped.

Checking taginfo it seems hazard=* [1] is in use. Why not go with it?

[1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/hazard
--
Sent from my phone, please forgive my brevity.

> On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 at 3:16 PM, Ty S <mensaty2006 at outlook.com (mailto:mensaty2006 at outlook.com)> wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dog_hazard
>
> Dangerous area with dogs.
>
> Please discuss on the page. I will respond to emails, but I rarely check, and it may take a bit to get back with you.
> -- Floridaeditor
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200512/ab236d4e/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200512/ab236d4e/attachment-0001.sig>