[Tagging] Examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

[Florian Lohoff]

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:17:20AM +0200, Arne Johannessen wrote:
> I interpreted "random person" as meaning "random traffic, not destined
> for your uncle's residence".
> 
> But perhaps you meant that the person is in fact a visitor destined
> for your uncle's residence – maybe trying to sell something or
> conducting a poll or whatever – and that doing so would be illegal? If
> so, in what way is it "clear" to the visitor that what they're doing
> is illegal?

I guess 90% of the typical driveways are "cul de sac" anyway - So there
cant be any through traffic. Technically the ones driving on that
way have a clear intent and will be visitors.

So tagging cul-de-sac with destination is nice - but basically a "no
op" for many reasons (Already has penalty in routing, technically no
through traffic possible etc etc)

Thats the point with the whole driveway discussion. Tagging any further
restriction on a driveway does at best change nothing, worst 
case make it unusable. You wont _gain_ anything.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
        UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200527/0f9a415e/attachment.sig>