[Tagging] religous bias - Feature Proposal - Voting - (Chapel of rest)

Brian M. Sperlongano zelonewolf at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 19:24:06 UTC 2020


That is clear and unambiguous terminology that is not religion-specific.  I
would support this.

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 2:10 PM António Madeira via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> In many modern places near cemeteries there's not a room, but several.
> So, I would prefer amenity=place_of_mourning
>
>
> Às 12:39 de 05/11/2020, Peter Elderson escreveu:
>
>
>
>> rate the following "favourable", "acceptable" or "unfavourable"?
>>
>> amenity=mourning
>>
>
> acceptable, though I think an amenity should be a feature, not an activity
>
>
>> amenity=place_of_mourning
>>
>
> favourable. Secondary tags could add details if necessary
>
>
>> amenity=mourning_room
>>
>
> unfavourable. Too specific.
>
>
>> amenity=viewing_arrangements
>>
>
> unfavourable. I think an amenity should describe a feature, not
> arrangements.
>
>
>> amenity=deceased_viewing
>>
>
> unfavourable.
>
>
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201105/cb90810d/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list