[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Pumping proposal

Yves ycai at mailbox.org
Sun Nov 22 08:34:03 UTC 2020

Given the number exposed here by Martin, and the fact that there is a few established data consumers, I think that preserving the pump tag as it is now and refine it with another tag would be a good idea indeed.

Le 22 novembre 2020 02:58:07 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> a écrit :
>sent from a phone
>> On 22. Nov 2020, at 02:32, François Lacombe <fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's true proposed tagging deprecates the current pump=* definition according to rationale and wishes to use the pump word in a more appropriate way.
>this would deprecate around 20k pump values describing a pump type, plus 15k yes/no.
>Looking at the no-values, 23% are not in combination with man_made https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/pump=no#combinations
>i.e. this is also used on other objects to state buildings there is no pump.
>I would also suggest you modify your proposal in a way that it is compatible with the current use of the pump tag
>Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201122/cf7fb854/attachment.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list