[Tagging] Segregated foot-cycle path with different surfaces

Hubert87 sg.forum at gmx.de
Mon Nov 23 18:01:54 UTC 2020


Hi Volker,

this looks like a valid solution to me.
Slight additions/corrections:

don't use "lanes=2" as this is for fully fledged carrigeways.

Also, you might want to use:
bicycle:lanes=no|designated
foot:lanes=designated|no

and maybe add a general "overall" tag

surface=paved


Yours

Hubert87

Am 23.11.2020 um 15:39 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
> How do I correctly tag this way: OSM way 434742113
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434742113>, Mapillary image
> <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/WA2lBoDF91ISfRY983d4wf>
> It's a segregated bidirectional foot-cycleway:
> highway=path
> bicycle=designated
> foot=designated
> segregated=yes
> onewy=no
> Its overall width is
> width=4
> It's illuminated
> lit=yes
> Its surface is ok:
> smoothness=good
> I want to indicate the relative position of foot and cycle lanes:
> lanes=2
> bicycle:lanes=no|yes
> foot:lanes=yes|no
> I'm tempted to extend this approach  to the surface and width as well:
> surface:lanes=asphalt|fine_gravel
> width:lanes=1.5|2.5
>
> Is this tagging correct? Are there (better) alternatives?
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201123/f7cf6ec7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list