[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 13:24:40 UTC 2020
On 27/11/2020 04:25, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
> Assuming that the boundary of that area is reasonably permanent, my
> first reaction is that this could be described by
> military=danger_area. However, that tag requires landuse=military as
> the primary tag, which probably isn't correct here.
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:59 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
> <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Not wanting to create a bunfight, but just reading the news, &
> wondering if this sort of thing should be tagged as a hazardous area?
Yes, there are precedents for having that sort of thing in OSM as
military areas of some sort - have a look at how the frontline in the
recent Azerbaijan / Armenia conflict was mapped over the last few months.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging