[Tagging] What does bicycle=no on a node means?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Oct 17, 2020, 00:17 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 16. Oct 2020, at 10:28, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>> Not in cases where 
>> (1) highway=cycleway is crossing road where cyclists are obligated to dismount
>> (2) highway=footway with bicycle=yes/designated is crossing road where cyclists
>> are obligated to dismount
>>
>
>
> in these cases the cycleway ceases to exist. Or would you say pushing only cycleways are ok? highway=cycleway with  bicycle=dismount?
>
Yes, in this cases cycleway is interrupted. And yes, splitting cycleway and mapping short section
of crossing itself as footway is possible tagging method. Maybe superior.

Nevertheless some crossings were mapped using highway=cycleway and bicycle=no on crossing
nodes, probably because it is much less fiddly to map it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201017/b7abbb9d/attachment.htm>