[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Proposal of electricity=* and electricity:origin
Lukas Richert
lrichert at posteo.de
Thu Oct 22 13:39:09 UTC 2020
There were quite a few comments the first time around, so I just wanted
to call attention to the electricity proposal (see links below) once
more. I fear it got lost in the hullabaloo about the man_made tag.
Also, perhaps relevant: both the power_supply
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power_supply> and socket
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket> keys describe the same
feature. power_supply so far has occasionally been used in the manner
that electricity proposes to be. Unfortunately, the proposal for
power_supply is relatively inconsistent. I think the socket:* tag is
better thought out and also currently more used. I would be in favor of
deprecating power_supply and separating the two meanings it currently
has into electricity=* and socket:*=#.
Regards, Luke
>> Hello all,
>>
>> after the comments on the confusing nature of the word 'source' in my
>> original proposal of 'electricity:source', I have now changed the
>> name to 'electricity:origin' as suggested on the discussion page.
>> Furthermore, I would like to revive and extend the proposal of the
>> key 'electricity' as this previously conflicted with parts of the
>> electricity:source proposal and was not consistent.
>>
>> Both proposal pages:
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/electricity
>>
>> [2]
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/electricity:origin
>>
>> The idea now is to allow for the tagging of buildings or amenities
>> that have electricity. The rationale is described in more detail at
>> [1]. Tags such as access, fee, schedule and origin can then narrow
>> down the availability to the public and the question of financial or
>> direct origin of the electricity.
>>
>> This is distinct from the drafted tag power_supply as it is used to
>> describe the type of sockets used at a specific outlet. The values
>> for that tag are still currently under discussion.
>>
>> I would also not tag this as a subset of power=* as this maps the
>> facilities and features that relate to the generation and
>> distribution of electrical power and should not be used to map the
>> consumers of electricity.
>>
>> I am eager to hear the feedback to the revised proposals!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201022/67bd34ba/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list