[Tagging] Tagging from fire_service_areas - landuse:emergency

[Tod Fitch]

Sounds line what are signed as “fire lanes” in the United States.

--
Sent from my phone, please forgive my brevity.

> On Tuesday, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:59 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com (mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 09:43, Supaplex <supaplex at riseup.net (mailto:supaplex at riseup.net)> wrote:
> >
> > We (or Christian) are talking about areas that must be kept free, especially near buildings, so that fire brigade vehicles can stand and work there in case of an emergency.
> >
> >
>
>
> Thanks, Supa - it's not a concept that I've ever heard of in Australia! Our firies just park in the street as needed!
> >
> > I think tagging of these areas is very useful for use by rescue services,
> >
> >
>
> Yes, probably would be.
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > How about "emergency = rescue_area" (very rarely in use)? I agree that landuse should not be used in this case, but we have "emergency" for this.
> >
> >
>
> As I say, I've never looked at it, but would emergency=clear_area work?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201027/aba81b5b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 868 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201027/aba81b5b/attachment.sig>