[Tagging] Tagging from fire_service_areas - landuse:emergency

[Mateusz Konieczny]

access=no should be enough, if parking searcher is not handling access=no/access=private
it is broken anyway


Oct 28, 2020, 09:19 by lrichert at posteo.de:

>
> I think here it would better to use the primary name space of      emergency, similar to disused/abandoned, so that routers/data      providers that don't consider this tag won't lead people to park      there.
>
> On 28/10/2020 05:21, Mateusz Konieczny      via Tagging wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Oct 28, 2020, 03:22 by >> andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>> :
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 13:20, Jonathon Rossi            <>>> jono at jonorossi.com>>> >            wrote:
>>>
>>>> We've got emergency=landing_site for                  helicopters, maybe just emergency=parking?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I like that, areas set aside for parking by emergency              vehicles. 
>>>
>>
>> amenity=parking access=no emergency=yes
>> seems a better fit to me
>>
>> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201028/f7422fad/attachment.htm>