[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Rideshare Access

[Simon Poole]

Am 31.10.2020 um 16:11 schrieb Philip Barnes:
> ...
> Also private hire, which need to be booked in advance and have the 
> same access rights/restrictions on the public highway as a private 
> car. For some reason I cannot fathom, in London private hire are 
> called minicabs.
>
> Uber and Lyft are legally private hire so whilst there may be a case 
> for access tags covering private hire there should not be a separate 
> tag. If different companies use different points at an airport that 
> can be covered by operator=*.
>
> I would avoid the term chauffeur as it implies somebody who is part of 
> the staff for somebody who also has a butler and a nanny.
>
Actually I quite like "private_hire" as an access value.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x4721711092E282EA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4922 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201031/a010ad05/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201031/a010ad05/attachment-0001.sig>