[Tagging] Documenting historic=anchor to the historic wiki page
Janko Mihelić
janjko at gmail.com
Mon Sep 7 20:53:09 UTC 2020
pon, 7. ruj 2020. u 22:15 Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> napisao je:
> In that case it would not be historic, just a random anchor put there
> because
> it looks pretty. Possibly tourism=artwork, but I'm not sure what would
> be a suitable artwork_type. It's not really an installation or a
> sculpture.
> It's really "found art" in the broader definition of the term. Has/had
> another purpose but has been appropriated as art.
>
Why do you think it's different from a historic=cannon?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200907/dccbc5b8/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list