[Tagging] [Talk-us] Large fire perimeter tagging?

[Andrew Harvey]

On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 18:58, stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com> wrote:

> This is useful because it shows not only where OSM mappers (like me) will
> need to update landcover
>

At least after the Australian fires, we still left natural=wood areas which
burned tagged that way, and in my view this is correct since they are still
are wooded areas even after the fire even with crown fires and with many
trees not surviving.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200930/aa9a9cbf/attachment.htm>