[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 139, Issue 1

stevea steveaOSM at softworkers.com
Fri Apr 2 02:58:26 UTC 2021

I do admit to liking how on April Fool's Day (at least in my culture), the tongues of others remain firmly in cheek.  Once a year, even all day, OK.  Beyond that, I'm glad we keep it serious around here.  Or do our best to do so.

Fun for a day, and done.  Now back to our regularly scheduled discussion.  As it were.

> On Apr 1, 2021, at 7:52 PM, Michael Patrick <geodesy99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The biggest point of contention was whether this tagging belongs in the `natural` or the `man_made` top-level key, which has been resolved in favour of `natural`.
> 'Human' is not verifiable, unless you do an actual genetic test. Best you can do is 'Humanoid' ( a human shape and sized mobile feature ). Also, it doesn't address con-joined individuals, like siamese twins or pregnant women ( would somebody carrying triplets count as one or four ?). 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

More information about the Tagging mailing list