[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -mass rock

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Apr 2 12:28:20 UTC 2021

to clarify:

I am 100% fine with tagging existing and visible remains/ruins

I can live with tagging barely visible remains or ones where
linking to tagged object is at best dubious
(such as mapping railway=abandoned where sole trace is
embankment/cutting or some other kind of earthworks).

I am not accepting mapping things of completely and utterly
gone, without any trace whatsoever - and without danger of
accidental remapping.
For example buildings and railway in place that is now open pit mine
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Turow.jpg  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/50.9071/14.9063 )
I worry that this historic=place_of_worship (however tagged)
can be similar to mapping say
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willa_Ro%C5%BCnowskich_w_Krakowiehttp://lh3.ggpht.com/_U-jCFu6f-jI/Sjwj0NKiJYI/AAAAAAAAG8E/pQ6oHG8tm1E/s512/59.jpg )
- now gone without any trace.

Apr 2, 2021, 13:39 by annekadistel at web.de:

> What would be the alternative to the historic tag? They are      clearly part of the Irish history/ heritage and the Heritage      Council has some of them mapped for that reason (according to      Wikipedia).
> Another Irish mapper had suggested      historic:place_of_worship=mass_rock.
> On 02/04/2021 12:13, Mateusz Konieczny      via Tagging wrote:
>> it seems that it is not always natural=rock, and it could be        also
>> natural=stone or part of natural=bare_rock
>> I am not fan of historic=place_of_worship as part of being        suspicious
>> about tagging historic data
>> Apr 2, 2021, 12:20 by >> annekadistel at web.de>> :
>>> Hello group,
>>> to be able to map historically significant mass rocks in          Ireland, I've
>>> started a proposal. They were places of worship for the 200          hundred
>>> years of the Penal Laws when practising Catholicism was          illegal in Ireland.
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/mass_rock
>>> Anne
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210402/37b177e7/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the Tagging mailing list