[Tagging] RFC - Discourage railway=preserved

Jeroen Hoek mail at jeroenhoek.nl
Mon Apr 5 14:40:59 UTC 2021

On 05-04-2021 16:25, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> Has anyone claimed that railway=preserved should be preserved?

I've asked a mapper whose specialty is maintaining railways in the
Netherlands, and they indicated that the lack of rendering in Carto
holds them back from migrating to the newer standard. Carto has an issue:


Would a patch that at least adds the same rendering as
`railway=preserved` for `railway=rail` + `railway:preserved=yes` be
accepted in Carto at this point?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210405/38c7053d/attachment.sig>

More information about the Tagging mailing list