[Tagging] RFC - Discourage railway=preserved
mail at jeroenhoek.nl
Mon Apr 5 14:40:59 UTC 2021
On 05-04-2021 16:25, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> Has anyone claimed that railway=preserved should be preserved?
I've asked a mapper whose specialty is maintaining railways in the
Netherlands, and they indicated that the lack of rendering in Carto
holds them back from migrating to the newer standard. Carto has an issue:
Would a patch that at least adds the same rendering as
`railway=preserved` for `railway=rail` + `railway:preserved=yes` be
accepted in Carto at this point?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Tagging