[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC -mass rock

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Sat Apr 10 18:56:57 UTC 2021


On 4/10/21 19:57, Bert -Araali- Van Opstal wrote:
> To me this should be:
> - signage AND
> - local knowledge OR school collection OR field name
> as only the signage is accessible and verifiable by every mapper on the 
> ground.

I would agree with that. If it looks like any other rock, then if you 
must map it, map a rock, but not a "mass rock". Especially if its 
"special use" is a thing of the past. If the "special use" is regular 
enough to be verifiable ("if you don't believe this is a mass rock, come 
here on a Sunday morning and you'll see") then I guess I'd accept 
tagging it, but if it's like "this was used as a mass rock hundreds of 
years ago and once a year they hold an outdoor mass here to remember" 
then I'm not sure this is mappable.

Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

More information about the Tagging mailing list