[Tagging] seamark:bridge:clearance_height=no_indications

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Aug 8, 2021, 00:21 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 4 Aug 2021, at 11:46, DjTQnhSoc via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking forward to your feedback!
>>
>
>
> tagging clearance is fine, but why should there be a seamark prefix?
>
For: Because it is tag that is currently in use
( https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=bridge%3Aclea )

Against: it will be also on inland waterways far away from sea

Against: entire seamark: prefixing seems to be a mistake in general.

Maybe it is a good moment to switch to non-prefixed version here
or introduce it? (but it will be definitely not done by StreetComplete)

============
In general: seamark namespace has some really dubious ideas

Similarly seamark:name is a pointless duplicate of ref
(as far as I can see - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:seamark:name )

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aseamark%3Atype%3Dbridge
seems to be a pure "please render me" tag

there is plenty of weirdness in seamark: namespace

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210808/1e158047/attachment.htm>