[Tagging] How to tag recreational route with multiple route types?

[Volker Schmidt]

Thank you Sarah,
that seems to be the correct solution.
Needs documenting in the wiki, I suppose

Multiple values for networks are fine in addition and necessary to avoid
conflicting tagging
The network values here in Italy are assigned by the mappers - we do not
have hierarchical bicycle or hiking networks.

Volker

Volker



On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 16:11, Sarah Hoffmann <lonvia at denofr.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:19:41PM +0100, Andy Townsend wrote:
> > On 12/08/2021 11:52, Peter Elderson wrote:
> > >
> > > I can think of three options:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > 2. multiple values for network: network=nwn;ncn
> > > This would work, but requires adapting tools and applications. Maybe
> induces name "localization", because it may be the same route but the name
> could differ, e.g.: "Limes hiking trail" vs "Limes cycling trail".
> > > ...
> >
> >
> > There are a few examples in the UK, so I added support for things like
> > "network=ncn;nhn;nwn" to map.atownsend.org.uk :
> https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=54.07759&lon=-2.19974
> > .
> >
> > Waymarked trails also supports it - see e.g.
> > https://riding.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!54.0752!-2.2093 .
>
> waymarkedtrails expects semicolon-separated values in
> the route tag, to be precise, e.g. route=hiking;bicycle;horse
>
> Sarah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210812/c699a2d7/attachment.htm>