[Tagging] type=* tags on trees

Yves ycai at mailbox.org
Thu Aug 19 05:43:46 UTC 2021


Hello,
Can you elaborate on your workflow, what do you mean exactly by sparse editing in JOSM?
Regards,
Yves 

Le 18 août 2021 20:36:57 GMT+02:00, Casper Kersten <casperkersten1 at gmail.com> a écrit :
>Dear readers of the Tagging mailing list,
>
>
>
>I discovered that there are over 36,000 trees tagged with type=*, a tag
>that is normally reserved for relations. After checking the tags in JOSM, I
>found that many different tags are duplicates of approved or de facto
>tagging schemes.
>
>
>
>Some examples:
>
>type=Ahorn - 200 uses - should be genus:de=Ahorn
>
>type=broad_leaf - 18 uses - should be leaf_type=broadleaved
>
>type=broadleaved - 132 uses - should be leaf_type=broadleaved
>
>type=deciduous - 85 uses - should be leaf_cycle=deciduous
>
>type=Eiche - 261 uses - should be genus:de=Eiche
>
>type=eucalyptus tree - 22 uses - should be genus=Eucalyptus
>
>type=evergreen - 159 uses - should be leaf_cycle=evergreen
>
>type=Lime - 49 uses - should be genus:en=Lime
>
>type=needleleaved - 33 uses - should be leaf_type=needleleaved
>
>type=Oak - 22 uses - should be genus:en=Oak
>
>type=oak - 87 uses - should be genus:en=Oak
>
>type=pine - 54 uses - should be genus:en=Pine
>
>etc.
>
>
>
>I propose to retag many of the type=* tags on trees to other common tagging
>schemes with sparse editing in JOSM in a single changeset. I am familiar
>with the tagging schemes and I am experienced with sparse editing in JOSM.
>Of course, only tags of which we can be sure will be changed.
>
>
>
>A very similar issue exists with other nodes and ways that are related to
>vegetation, such as landuse=forest and natural=wood. I suggest addressing
>this at a later moment with the experience of the current topic.
>
>
>
>I do not propose to translate any genus:de and genus:en tags to genus=*,
>because in my opinion this topic deserves a separate discussion.
>
>
>
>I do not propose to retag type=palm, which is used on about 31,000 trees,
>also because in my opinion this topic deserves a separate discussion. I
>would like to focus on the other type=* tags on trees.
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>
>Casper (Friendly_Ghost)
>
>
>
>P.s. My https://overpass-turbo.eu/ query for reference:
>
>
>
>[out:xml][timeout:600];
>
>node["natural"="tree"]["type"];
>
>(._;>;);
>
>out meta;
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210819/b2932a59/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list