[Tagging] cyclist profiles - was:Feature Proposal - RFC - value 'basic_network' - cycle_network?

[Volker Schmidt]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 11:56, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:

>  For mapping, it doesn't really matter which purpose the system itself
> has, although this purpose certainly will motivate the mappers to map it,
> and the users to use it.
>

But it matters for routers/navigation systems !
That's the point I am trying to make.
If we map the distinction between commuter and touristic routes we provide
the end user by means of the preferences built into the router navigation
(or by offering the end user to select the type of routes she prefers) to
be sent along fast or touristic routes. That is something which to my
knowledge most (all?) car navigation systems cannot achieve. Don't
under-estimate this aspect.
Your friendly and happy cycletouristic end user Volker.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211206/485f5c3b/attachment.htm>