[Tagging] Tagging standards using url:

[Dave F]

I'm struggling to see its purpose.
The website itself indicates the website is related. Why would someone 
add a website that isn't related?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2950525533
The only example I could find in your changeset appeared very 
'homemade'. How officially related to subject are these tags?
Do you have a couple of other examples?

Website tags are to link a specific website to a specific object, 
usually created by those in authority of those objects.

If (and it's a very big if) tags relating to an area should be placed 
anywhere, it should be on the boundary of that area.

DaveF


On 17/12/2021 09:26, Martino Scaglione via Tagging wrote:
> Hello everyone. In the former weeks I've created some tags in the form 
> of suffixes for the tag url:, like url:chiese_italiane, 
> url:anagrafe_biblioteche_italiane, to indicate that the url goes to a 
> site related to that feature for which I am inserting the tag, called 
> Chiese Italiane or Anagrafe delle Biblioteche Italiane (These words 
> mean respectively Italian Churches and Register office of Italian 
> Libraries).
> Some users think this use of the tag is inappropriate since it creates 
> confusion and in their words would be useless.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114830660
> This is a changeset discussion on the topic (you can simply use a 
> translate software)
> I thought I'd bring the matter here because it's not specifically an 
> italian problem, since we are talking about creating a tag suffix to 
> url: for each site has a page completely dedicated to a feature (not 
> including newspaper and magazines articles obviously), if we expand 
> the reasoning behind the two examples that I made.
> What do you think?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging