[Tagging] Red light cameras
Volker Schmidt
voschix at gmail.com
Mon Dec 20 16:49:22 UTC 2021
I would not use technical details as criteria, and stick to the function.
We are talking about red-light-violation detection. It does not matter how
that is achieved. It's important that it happens. in that sense the
enforcement relation, even without a device, should do nicely.
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 17:38, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 10:32 AM Raphael <dafadllyn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Graeme, hi everyone
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 22:53, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I've done it as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7095018891
>>
>> Thanks for your input, Graeme!
>>
>> However, i'm not entirely convinced of using man_made=surveillance +
>> surveillance:type=camera for red light cameras, because the red light
>> cameras i know look more similar to speed cameras (larger, include a
>> flash) than to surveillance cameras.
>>
>
> I mean, that's the same tag used for cameras used for video traffic
> detection as well, even though the only time human eyes ever watch the
> video feed are the traffic engineers calibrating the detection boxes and
> camera aim. The relation is what explains that it's used for enforcement
> of the red light.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20211220/dc3d7afc/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list