[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - ogham_stone

[Jan Michel]

Hi,
several of the tags mentioned in the "Extra" section don't follow 
established tagging schemes.Could you update this section for further 
discussion?

- It's 'Ogam' and 'Latn' with a capital letter
- 'location' shouldn't be used for free text.
- The default tag 'inscription' should be used (using Ogham), 
iscription:pgl-Ogam is purely optional
- heritage=yes is not among the documented tags
- inscription:script is neither documented nor necessary - a user just 
can check which Unicode page is used in the 'inscription' tag.
- inscription:en might be useful for a translation
- 'name' should only be used if it is well-known or/and available from 
an open source

Jan


On 09.02.21 18:04, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote:
> I've overhauled the proposal, I hope it agrees with more people now. And 
> I hope I got all the language codes etc right.
> 
> To avoid the stone_type vs stone discussion, I'm following the example 
> of historic=rune_stone, because following an established and very 
> similar example makes sense to me.
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ogham_stone
> 
> Is a five day RFC period sufficient?