[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery

Daniel Capilla dcapillae at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 20:18:14 UTC 2021


On 11/2/21 20:47, Paul Allen wrote:
> Our tagging space is slowly degenerating from the white noise of entropy.

I want a T-shirt with that on it! :D

Joking aside, I understand what Paul is saying. However, this proposal 
does not try to solve a problem that goes beyond it.

The mappers are using "historic=cemetery". It seems to me to be 
appropriate to indicate a cemetery of historic significance in 
accordance with the guidelines for the use of the"historic" key. The 
value is not confusing, its meaning is quite clear.

If you think my proposal might cause confusion if it is approved (or 
even if it is proposed), I can withdraw it and just document the tag on 
the wiki as a tag in use but not formally proposed.

In my opinion, this proposal is very simple, useful, and not 
problematic, but you have more experience than me. What do you suggest 
to me? I am open to suggestions. My initial intention was to clarify the 
issue, not to obscure it further.

Question for the Tagging mailing list: Should I propose it or not?

Regards,

Daniel





More information about the Tagging mailing list