[Tagging] Draft proposal for historic cemetery
Daniel Capilla
dcapillae at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 20:18:14 UTC 2021
On 11/2/21 20:47, Paul Allen wrote:
> Our tagging space is slowly degenerating from the white noise of entropy.
I want a T-shirt with that on it! :D
Joking aside, I understand what Paul is saying. However, this proposal
does not try to solve a problem that goes beyond it.
The mappers are using "historic=cemetery". It seems to me to be
appropriate to indicate a cemetery of historic significance in
accordance with the guidelines for the use of the"historic" key. The
value is not confusing, its meaning is quite clear.
If you think my proposal might cause confusion if it is approved (or
even if it is proposed), I can withdraw it and just document the tag on
the wiki as a tag in use but not formally proposed.
In my opinion, this proposal is very simple, useful, and not
problematic, but you have more experience than me. What do you suggest
to me? I am open to suggestions. My initial intention was to clarify the
issue, not to obscure it further.
Question for the Tagging mailing list: Should I propose it or not?
Regards,
Daniel
More information about the Tagging
mailing list