[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse bush

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 11:56, stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com> wrote:

> On Feb 13, 2021, at 4:28 PM, Bert -Araali- Van Opstal <
> bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In this case would much better fit the use and purpose. You can
> additionally add the key "managed" (not "maintained", it is "managed"),
> even define an addtional value for it to provide more detail. PArts of it
> seem to have grown to become trees, if you like to provide more detail
> these can be mapped as separate areas with natural=wood.
>
> Yes, managed and maintained remain blurry compared to one another.  "The
> hand of humans" in nature can be said by many to be heavy and noticeable,
> creating land use and land cover patterns which are rich and storied, this
> tapestry continues to unfold upon Earth as long as we are here.  Brian's
> suggestions about "managed" do lead in a better direction.
>

Apologies, when I look back, Brian did indeed use "managed", not
"maintained", & that is what I was referring to.

"Protected-area" - once again, Hmmm?

They are actually signposted as "Dune Stabilisation / Beach Protection
Area. Please keep out", so does that make them a =nature_reserve?

Incidentally, here's another shot from the beach side:

https://goo.gl/maps/JF3SNVm9iHfUVTYS9

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210214/97f80225/attachment.htm>