[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forestry(_compartment) relations

[David Marchal]

It may be wood extraction, but it may also be recreation or environmental protection; in many cases, such as public forests in France, forestry areas are used concurrently for the three goals. That also explains why saying that "this land is used for forestry" is tricky: forestry is technically the mean of land use, not the land use itself. Besides, the goal of forestry is not unique: it is often wood extraction, but not always and not only.

Regards.

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Le dimanche, 14. février 2021 10:01, Marc_marc marc_marc at mailo.com a écrit :

> Le 13.02.21 à 17:12, David Marchal via Tagging a écrit :
>
>> I precendently answered why I thought boundary instead of landuse:
>> the proposal relies on the boundary=* tag because the proposal notion of
>> a forestry area is, as I understand it, inherently a boundary.
>
> so what's the landuse of a forestry area if your proposal is accepted ?
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210214/ed15158d/attachment.htm>