[Tagging] Deprecation - waterway=riverbank vs water=river

[Martin Machyna]

This is exactly the bending of the rule that we want to remove. There is 
no reason why rivers should be exempt if other tags have to comply.


On 14.2.21 4:07 , Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> It is "One feature, one OSM element", not "One feature, one OSM tag"
>
> See 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#Multiple_tags 
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#Multiple_tags>
>
>
> Feb 14, 2021, 21:40 by bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com:
>
>     Is this a role or a guideline then, not clear to me, how do we
>     call it?
>
>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
>     <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element>
>
>     Greetings, Bert Araali
>
>     On 14/02/2021 22:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>     sent from a phone
>>
>>
>>>     On 14 Feb 2021, at 19:43, Martin Machyna<machyna at gmail.com>  <mailto:machyna at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>     - resolved violation of "one feature one tag" rule
>>>
>>     there is no such rule.
>>
>>     What speaks against deprecating one of the tags is that people have explicitly voted to keep both tags :)
>>
>>
>>     Cheers Martin
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Tagging mailing list
>>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org  <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging  <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210214/070a4091/attachment.htm>