[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop as post-partner

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 16 Feb 2021, at 01:46, georg2016 at nurfuerspam.de wrote:
> 
> Sticking with 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:post_office:type means we must
> always also add amenity=post_office which is not possible for all 
> locations that are tagged as amenity.


can you elaborate why the key post_office:type requires adding another key? 

Btw., if we’re already discussing an improvement of the tagging it seems a good opportunity to get rid of the meaningless :type suffix

Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210216/cb03a460/attachment.htm>