[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - holy well

[Anne-Karoline Distel]

Am 19/02/2021 um 11:39 schrieb Paul Allen:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 10:52, Anne-Karoline Distel
> <annekadistel at web.de <mailto:annekadistel at web.de>> wrote:
>
>     (On a related matter, there are mass paths in Ireland, tracks/
>     footways that were only used to go to church.
>
>
> If they are not public footpaths (some will be) then these can be mapped
> with appropriate access restrictions.
I will have a good think about it, obviously restricted access needs to
be marked. The one I mapped had a kissing gate at the end, that's how I
got thinking that it must be something more than just an ordinary path.
>
>     I need to read up more about it, because that is another thing the
>     council wants to map. I don't know if they lead to holy wells as
>     well. I have only mapped one and used name=Mass path, but I'm not
>     sure if that is sufficient.)
>
>
> Your council's mapping requirements seem to be getting more and more
> esoteric.  Would it be better to let them use uMap for these things?
Must be the lockdown, I don't know. They see it as heritage and rightly
so. It's probably to do with prevention of littering or something.
>
> --
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210219/f9c10410/attachment-0001.htm>