[Tagging] Access restrictions and expressway=yes
Minh Nguyen
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
Sat Feb 20 20:39:36 UTC 2021
Vào lúc 06:49 2021-02-19, Fernando Trebien đã viết:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the usage of expressway=yes went up from ~2k to ~12k
> elements from mid 2018 to mid 2019, after remaining stable around
> ~1.8k elements between 2012 to 2018, and has grown at a rate of
> approximately +2k elements per year since then. It is mainly used in
> the U.S., but it would also be useful in Brazil and probably in many
> other countries as well. I saw that the article does not mention any
> default access restrictions, but the original proposal does, [1] so
> I'm not sure if they apply or not. They almost completely overlap with
> access restrictions implied by motorroad=*. Before recommending wider
> adoption, I would like to clarify this detail first. [2]
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Expressway_indication#Implied_tags
> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:expressway#Implied_access_restrictions
Vid the Kid proposed expressway=* alongside a proposal for motorway=*.
[1] These proposals seem to have been primarily influenced by local
cartographic and traffic engineering distinctions, rather than routing
considerations.
Conventionally, U.S. road maps distinguish between "expressways"
(limited-access or partially controlled-access roads) and "freeways"
(controlled-access roads) with a different color and/or line pattern.
[2] (The term "limited-access" refers to the presence of abutters and
at-grade intersections, not access keys like foot=*.) Unlike in other
countries, the distinction between expressways and freeways is not
consistently expressed by law or signage, and it also doesn't neatly
align with the global highway=* definitions in OSM, especially when it
comes to substandard roads.
From a traffic engineering standpoint, an expressway differs from a
surface street by meeting most of these criteria:
* Designed for high speeds (doesn't necessarily have a high speed limit)
* A dual carriageway
* Frontage roads consolidate driveway access
* A mix of ramps and at-grade intersections
An expressway doesn't meet all the criteria of a freeway, for example by
having a few signalized or unsignalized intersections with cross
streets. An expressway may be a relic of an older time before freeways,
a political compromise between motorist and environmental interests, or
a surface street being gradually upgraded to a freeway in stages as
funding allows.
I think the proposal's mention of implied access tags may have been
meant to justify the need for new keys apart from the existing highway=*
scheme, but it doesn't seem core to the proposal. The current key
description at [3] doesn't mention access restrictions at all.
By contrast, motorroad=* apparently is all about access restrictions and
legal distinctions. [4][5] If expressway=* gets deprecated in favor of
motorroad=*, then the latter key's definition becomes even more muddled,
and it becomes even less likely that a global router would ever use it
for anything.
[1]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Motorway_indication
[2]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kansas_official_transportation_map_legend.png
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:expressway
[4]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-January/058960.html
[5]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-January/058972.html
--
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
More information about the Tagging
mailing list