[Tagging] Automatic edit: access=visitors --> access=customers

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 11:20:37 UTC 2021


I read this as: "I intend to document access=visitors, so we can from now
on distinguish between access=customers and access=visitors"!

Good idea!

Peter Elderson


Op vr 26 feb. 2021 om 12:09 schreef Sören alias Valor Naram <
valinora at gmx.net>:

> Ok but then why is access=visitors not documented? We need to distinguish
> between valid and invalid tagging and need to know when to use which tag.
> Documentation is therefore a must be and should be a rule instead of just a
> voluntary thing.
>
> ~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Automatic edit: access=visitors --> access=customers
> From: Volker Schmidt
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> CC:
>
>
> For me there seems to be a difference:
>
> visitors visit a place, they typically do not purchase anything:
>
>    - I am a customer of a supermarket, or any other shop.
>    - I am a visitor of a National Park or of a Museum or of the European
>    Parliament building
>
> Could well be that this distinction is not always clear, and that there is
> a cultural background in that distinction.
>
> I would  certainly not be in favour of an automated edit.
>
> Volker
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_-8922207725463195698_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 10:59, Sören alias Valor Naram <valinora at gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
>> cumberstoned over `access=visitors` which is not documented and which I
>> and also others believe should be `access=customers`. This would be a
>> less problematic automatic edit you will definitely like and which can
>> show how important and sometimes unproblematic they are.
>>
>> Before writing
>> a proposal for it I'm willing to hear your thoughts on this. I also
>> believe that automatic edits help to correct tagging mistakes when done
>> properly and following UNIX philosophy.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> ~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20210226/614f9538/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list